Buy Crypto- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Avalanche Secures $250M RWA Surge Through Grove and Janus Henderson Partnership
As of today, August 8, 2025, the Avalanche blockchain is making waves with a major $250 million boost in real-world assets (RWAs), thanks to a strategic move by Grove involving two innovative funds from Janus Henderson. Imagine Avalanche as a bustling digital highway suddenly expanding its lanes to handle more high-value traffic—this partnership is set to dramatically widen the network’s reach in the tokenization world, drawing in institutional players and everyday investors alike.
Grove’s Bold Push into Avalanche RWAs with Janus Henderson
Picture this: Grove, a sophisticated credit protocol designed for institutions and supported by Steakhouse Financial, is gearing up to channel a whopping $250 million worth of RWAs directly onto the Avalanche blockchain. This isn’t just about numbers; it’s a game-changer that could transform how we think about blending traditional finance with cutting-edge blockchain tech. By doing so, Grove is poised to supercharge Avalanche’s presence in the tokenized asset space, making it a more attractive destination for serious money.
In this exciting collaboration, Grove is teaming up with Centrifuge, a leading platform for tokenizing assets, to bring two standout products from Janus Henderson onto Avalanche. Janus Henderson, managing a massive $373 billion in assets, is renowned for its lineup of mutual funds, ETFs, and alternative investment options. It’s like inviting a financial heavyweight into your living room to share the best investment strategies—reliable, proven, and now fully digitized.
Right from the start, Grove plans to invest capital into the Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) and the Janus Henderson Anemoy Treasury Fund (JTRSY). Think of JAAA as your gateway to the dynamic world of collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), a vital part of the credit and fixed-income markets. This fund was originally brought onchain via Centrifuge, the same innovative platform that’s tokenized things like the S&P 500 Index fund, proving its track record in bridging real assets to blockchain.
On the other hand, JTRSY acts like a secure vault for short-term US Treasury bills, actively managed and issued through Centrifuge. As of the latest figures today, it boasts over $550 million in assets, with a significant portion still rooted on Ethereum. These metrics highlight its appeal—low risk, steady returns, and now expanding to Avalanche for even broader access. It’s akin to upgrading from a reliable old car to a sleek electric model that’s faster and more efficient.
Grove itself emerged from Grove Labs, nurtured under Sky (which you might remember as MakerDAO). As a subsidiary of Steakhouse Financial—a firm excelling in digital asset advice, DeFi, and stablecoins—Grove has deep roots in the Morpho ecosystem. This lineage adds a layer of credibility, much like a family business passing down expertise through generations.
How This Ties into Brand Alignment in Tokenization
This partnership isn’t just a financial transaction; it’s a perfect example of brand alignment in the evolving world of tokenization. Grove’s institutional focus meshes seamlessly with Janus Henderson’s reputation for high-quality asset management, while Avalanche provides the scalable infrastructure to make it all work efficiently. It’s like three puzzle pieces clicking together—Grove brings the credit protocol savvy, Janus Henderson the traditional finance muscle, and Avalanche the blockchain speed—creating a unified front that appeals to investors seeking reliability and innovation. This alignment not only boosts trust but also positions them as leaders in making RWAs more accessible, encouraging broader adoption across the crypto landscape.
Speaking of smart moves in crypto, if you’re looking to trade or invest in assets like those on Avalanche, consider WEEX exchange. As a trusted platform with robust security features and user-friendly tools, WEEX stands out for its commitment to seamless trading experiences, low fees, and support for emerging tokens. It’s the kind of exchange that aligns perfectly with innovative projects like this, enhancing your portfolio’s potential while prioritizing credibility and ease of use.
Tokenized RWAs Growing Beyond Ethereum’s Dominance
These new capital injections from Grove are set to more than double Avalanche’s total onchain RWA value. Based on the most up-to-date data as of August 8, 2025, Avalanche now supports 35 RWAs with a combined worth of $450 million—a significant leap from previous figures, underscoring the network’s rapid growth.
While Ethereum still leads the pack with about 55% of the RWA market share, alternatives like Avalanche are catching up fast, offering faster transactions and lower costs that make them ideal for tokenization. Compare it to choosing between a crowded city center and a spacious suburb—Ethereum has the history, but Avalanche provides the room to grow without the congestion.
Other networks are in the mix too. Aptos, for instance, has seen a boom in tokenization activity, fueled by big names like BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, and Berkeley Square. Platforms such as Solana, Stellar, and Algorand are also ramping up their RWA adoption, creating a diverse ecosystem where competition drives innovation.
Aptos’ chief business officer, Solomon Tesfaye, recently emphasized how legislation like the US GENIUS Act is speeding up this trend, positioning stablecoins as trustworthy bridges to tokenized assets. It’s backed by real evidence: a recent RedStone report notes that while private credit and US Treasury bonds dominate the RWA scene—thanks to tokenization’s edge in transparency and efficiency—areas like equities and commodities are emerging as hot spots for growth.
This expansion echoes broader industry shifts, such as major banks like Goldman Sachs and BNY offering tokenized money market funds to clients, proving that traditional finance is fully embracing blockchain’s potential. On Twitter today, discussions are buzzing around Avalanche’s RWA milestone, with posts from influencers highlighting how this could outpace Ethereum in scalability. Official announcements from Grove and Janus Henderson confirm the $250 million target, sparking threads about the future of DeFi integration. Google’s top searches related to this include “What are RWAs on Avalanche?” and “How to invest in tokenized Treasuries,” reflecting widespread curiosity amid rising crypto adoption.
Even traditional finance giants are building on Ethereum’s layer-2 solutions to tokenize trillions in RWAs, but Avalanche’s approach offers a compelling alternative with its speed and cost advantages. It’s like watching a relay race where each network passes the baton, pushing the entire industry forward.
FAQ
What are RWAs and why are they important on Avalanche?
RWAs, or real-world assets, refer to tokenized versions of traditional investments like Treasuries or loans on blockchain. On Avalanche, they’re crucial because they bring institutional-grade assets to a fast, low-cost network, making them more accessible and efficient for investors compared to slower alternatives.
How does the Grove and Janus Henderson partnership benefit investors?
This collaboration allows investors to access high-quality funds like JAAA and JTRSY directly on Avalanche, offering exposure to CLOs and US Treasuries with blockchain’s transparency. It’s like getting premium investments with added speed and lower fees, potentially boosting returns while reducing risks.
Is Avalanche becoming a top choice for RWAs over Ethereum?
Yes, Avalanche is gaining ground with its $450 million in RWAs as of August 8, 2025, thanks to scalability advantages. While Ethereum leads, Avalanche’s growth—evidenced by partnerships like this—makes it a strong contender for those seeking efficiency in tokenized assets.
You may also like
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?
Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x
Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames
Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun
Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold
Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar
Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?
Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire
Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition
From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash
The Xiaomi electric vehicle factory in Beijing's Daxing district has become the new Jerusalem for the American elite
Lean Harness, Fat Skill: The Real Source of 100x AI Productivity
Ultraman is not afraid of his mansion being attacked; he has a fortress.
US-Iran Negotiations Collapse, Bitcoin Faces Battle to Defend $70,000 Level
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
App