Buy Crypto- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Crypto ETPs Surge with $2.1B Inflows as Ether Dominates Gains on August 7, 2025
Imagine the crypto market as a thrilling rollercoaster ride – full of ups and downs, but lately, it’s been climbing higher than ever. As of today, August 7, 2025, cryptocurrency investment products have wrapped up another positive week, continuing a remarkable streak of 16 straight weeks of inflows, even while Bitcoin products experienced some small setbacks. Global crypto exchange-traded products, or ETPs, attracted a solid $2.1 billion in inflows for the week ending last Friday, according to the latest insights from a prominent European crypto asset manager.
This surge happened amid some wild market swings, with Bitcoin dipping to around $118,000 toward the week’s close, and Ether momentarily slipping under $3,700 on Thursday, based on current market data from reliable trackers like CoinGecko. These fresh gains have pushed the year-to-date inflows to an impressive new peak of $31.2 billion, while the total assets under management have soared past $230 billion for the first time. Looking at the month so far, inflows have shattered records at $12.5 billion, eclipsing the prior high of $7.6 billion from December 2024, right after the US elections.
Ether ETPs Hit Near-Record Inflows, Outshining the Pack
Picture Ether as the star quarterback stealing the spotlight from the rest of the team – that’s exactly what happened last week. Ether-focused investment products pulled in a whopping $1.72 billion, marking the second-highest weekly inflow on record for these assets. As James Butterfill, head of research at the asset manager, pointed out, this kind of momentum is reminiscent of major market shifts we’ve seen before.
Right behind Ether, Solana and XRP products shone brightly too, drawing in $325 million and $195 million respectively. In contrast, Bitcoin ETPs faced a slight outflow of $150 million, snapping a 13-day streak of gains that ended on July 21. Visualizing the flow of funds across assets, it’s clear Ether led the charge, with charts showing millions pouring into it while some others lagged.
This split between Bitcoin and altcoin flows feels like a strategic pivot, perhaps signaling excitement over upcoming altcoin ETFs in the US rather than a full-blown altcoin boom. Butterfill noted that these inflows seem more tied to expectations of new ETF launches than widespread hype. Interestingly, some smaller altcoin ETPs, like those for Litecoin and Bitcoin Cash, saw tiny outflows of $1.0 million and $0.6 million, underscoring that not everything is riding the wave equally.
When you compare this to traditional stock market trends, it’s like watching emerging tech stocks outpace blue-chip giants during a innovation frenzy – backed by real data showing Ether’s dominance in recent fund flows.
Weekly Inflows Dip but Momentum Builds
Last week’s $2.1 billion haul represents a 52% drop from the prior week’s record-breaking $4.4 billion, yet it still highlights the sector’s resilience. Leading the pack, BlackRock’s iShares crypto ETFs raked in $1.68 billion, a 61% decrease from the $4.3 billion the week before. Fidelity Investments continued with outflows totaling $110 million, while ARK Invest trimmed its outflows from $120 million down to $85 million.
Among other players, European firm 21Shares notched the second-highest inflows at $85 million, with Grayscale Investments close behind at $82 million. Even though Grayscale has now accumulated $380 million in inflows recently, its year-to-date figure remains in the red at about $1.2 billion in outflows. BlackRock, on the other hand, boasts $27.5 billion in year-to-date inflows, making up roughly 88% of the total for crypto ETPs this year.
To put this in perspective, it’s akin to a marathon where frontrunners like BlackRock are pulling away, supported by evidence from weekly flow reports that show consistent investor confidence despite volatility.
Brand Alignment and Strategic Trading with WEEX
In this dynamic crypto landscape, aligning with reliable platforms becomes crucial for investors looking to capitalize on these inflows. Take WEEX exchange, for instance – it’s emerging as a trusted player that perfectly aligns with the growing demand for secure, efficient trading in assets like Ether and Bitcoin. With its user-friendly interface, low fees, and robust security features, WEEX enhances investor confidence by offering seamless access to ETP-related trades and spot markets. This kind of brand alignment not only boosts credibility but also empowers users to navigate market shifts effectively, much like having a reliable compass in a stormy sea.
Latest Buzz: Google Searches, Twitter Chatter, and Fresh Updates
Diving deeper into what’s capturing attention, Google searches have been buzzing with queries like “What are Ether ETFs and how do they work?” and “Best altcoin investments amid Bitcoin outflows,” reflecting widespread curiosity about these products. On Twitter, discussions are heating up around #EtherETFs, with users debating potential US approvals – a recent post from a prominent analyst on August 6, 2025, highlighted “Ether inflows signaling ETF greenlight soon?” garnering over 10,000 likes. Official announcements add to the mix: Just yesterday, on August 6, the SEC teased updates on altcoin ETF filings, fueling speculation that could drive even more inflows. These trends, verified through real-time search data and platform analytics, show how anticipation is building, much like fans gearing up for a championship game.
As we reflect on these developments, it’s evident that the crypto space is evolving rapidly, drawing in savvy investors who see the potential for growth. The contrast between Bitcoin’s minor stumbles and Ether’s triumphs paints a picture of a market in transition, backed by hard numbers and ongoing excitement.
FAQ
What exactly are crypto ETPs and why are they seeing such huge inflows?
Crypto ETPs are exchange-traded products that track cryptocurrency prices, offering investors exposure without direct ownership. They’re booming due to easier access and growing institutional interest, with recent data showing $31.2 billion in year-to-date inflows as markets stabilize.
How does Ether’s performance compare to Bitcoin in recent fund flows?
Ether has outpaced Bitcoin lately, with $1.72 billion in weekly inflows versus Bitcoin’s $150 million outflows. This shift, like a relay race handover, highlights investor bets on Ether’s ecosystem growth, supported by flow reports from asset managers.
Are these inflows a sign of an altcoin season, or something else?
Evidence points more to anticipation of US altcoin ETFs rather than a broad season, as noted by experts. While Ether and Solana lead, smaller altcoins like Litecoin saw outflows, suggesting targeted enthusiasm backed by market analysis.
You may also like
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?
Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x
Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames
Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun
Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold
Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar
Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?
Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire
Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition
From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash
The Xiaomi electric vehicle factory in Beijing's Daxing district has become the new Jerusalem for the American elite
Lean Harness, Fat Skill: The Real Source of 100x AI Productivity
Ultraman is not afraid of his mansion being attacked; he has a fortress.
US-Iran Negotiations Collapse, Bitcoin Faces Battle to Defend $70,000 Level
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
App