On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

By: blockbeats|2026/04/20 18:00:02
0
Share
copy

On April 18, the cross-chain bridge of Kelp DAO was attacked, with the attacker minting 116,500 rsETH tokens not backed by real assets, then depositing them into Aave and borrowing WETH. Aave Guardians initiated an emergency freeze within hours. According to on-chain estimates by Lookonchain, Aave V3 and V4 face a potential bad debt of about $195 million.

In contrast, the lending protocol SparkLend in the MakerDAO (Sky) ecosystem did not suffer any losses.

This was not because Spark's team was smarter than Aave's, nor because they foresaw the vulnerability of this cross-chain bridge in advance. The reason Spark exited rsETH was outlined in a governance forum post 3 months ago, completely unrelated to the security of the bridge contract.

January 29, 2026, is the key date of this article. On that day, Spark executed a governance action called Spell, halting new rsETH supply. On the same day, Aave's rsETH E-Mode was launched, allowing users to borrow WETH using rsETH as collateral with a maximum Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio of 93%.

One exiting, one expanding, both on the same day.

The decision to exit by Spark had its starting point in a governance post submitted by PhoenixLabs (Spark's ecosystem executor) on January 16, 2026. The reason for the exit was straightforward: low rsETH usage, with almost all volume coming from a single wallet (on-chain address 0xb99a), whose owner had expressed willingness to use alternative collateral like wstETH or weETH. The original governance post stated, "Exiting rsETH can improve SparkLend's safety margin and increase risk-adjusted returns." This was a periodic asset cleanup, with tBTC, ezETH, and the entire Gnosis Chain market exiting in the same batch, all for the unified reason of "low usage."

On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

Aave's expansion decision had an earlier starting point, originating from a proposal launched by ACI (Aave Chan Initiative), a governance proposal organization led by Marc Zeller, on November 17, 2025. The proposal's motivation was clear: "Restore WETH utilization, expecting to attract $1 billion rsETH inflow." Chaos Labs completed risk parameter validation in January, confirming an E-Mode LTV of 93% and a liquidation threshold of 95%. Decision-making parties included ACI, Chaos Labs, LlamaRisk, and the Aave Community Voters. This was a multi-party-driven expansion decision, not a mistake by a single entity.

Three months later, the market provided the outcome.

In Aave's current Umbrella insurance mechanism, the available funds amount to around $50 million, covering only 25% of the potential $195 million default. The loss absorption order is as follows: aWETH stakers first, followed by WETH depositors pro-rata, then stkAAVE and the DAO treasury. Aave's TVL dropped from $26.4 billion to $19.8 billion, including panic withdrawals. The USDT market utilization reached 100% within hours, with approximately $300 million in new borrowing.

In Spark's rsETH market on SparkLend, the current frozen value is $37,300, equivalent to 15.32 rsETH. The wallet address 0xb99a, which almost entirely migrated to wstETH and weETH after new supply was halted on January 29, aligns perfectly with the governance forum's prediction.

Spark co-founder Sam MacPherson (@hexonaut) highlighted on April 19 that claiming no risk exposure to rsETH in a protocol does not mean there is truly no risk exposure, as indirect exposure remains for users with collateral in the affected lending markets. Spark did not incur direct losses, but indirect risks are still being assessed.

Two protocols made opposite decisions on the same day, indicating that it is not about who made the right decision between Spark and Aave; the root issues of the two systems are fundamentally different.

Spark's risk management logic uses the trigger of "whether marginal cost exceeds marginal revenue," with metrics such as utilization below the threshold, excessive concentration of a single user, and underperforming risk-adjusted returns, triggering assets to be placed on an exit candidate list. This is an active, efficiency-driven tightening mechanism unrelated to the asset's own security risk.

Aave's logic trigger is the "market expansion opportunity." With low WETH utilization and a sizable rsETH market, the E-Mode can attract incremental capital. From this entry point, the parameter direction is expansion, with an LTV of 93%, a generous supply cap, and multiple governing bodies pushing together.

These two protocols address completely different questions: "Is this asset worth holding further?" or "How much incremental value can this asset bring?" Both sets of questions are valid business logic before a risk event is triggered, with the referee appearing only after the trigger.

The security outcome of Spark has another layer of support.

In a post on April 19, Sam MacPherson announced the "exit of rsETH" and mentioned: "SparkLend has rate-limited deposit and borrowing caps. Its oracle mechanism also utilizes a three-party median." This statement points to the other two lines of defense in Spark's risk management system.

One is the on-chain physical constraints. The Rate-Limited Supply Cap restricts the maximum supply within a unit of time, while the Borrow Cap limits the maximum borrowing size. The implication of these two designs is that even if Spark had not exited rsETH at the time, an attacker would not be able to deposit $292 million worth of rsETH in one go, as the loss magnitude would be forcibly capped.

The other line of defense is at the price information level, with a three-party median oracle taking the median of prices from three independent sources: Chronicle, Chainlink, and RedStone. In extreme scenarios, it falls back to Uniswap TWAP. If a single price source is manipulated, it does not affect the liquidation trigger. In contrast, Aave faced an exposure window due to oracle price lag in this event, highlighting a design difference rather than an operational mistake.

The design logic of the three lines of defense is consistent: not relying on the prior identification of specific risks but rather limiting the maximum exposure of any single risk event at a system level.

The final loss figure depends on Kelp DAO's loss allocation plan. Currently, three options coexist: socialized loss among all on-chain rsETH holders (reducing the default scale), standalone losses for L2 rsETH holders (maintaining the Aave mainnet defaults), and snapshot rollback (extremely operationally difficult). This figure will be determined in the upcoming weeks.

However, the results of the two decision philosophies are now quantifiable, with a gap of approximately $195 million. The trigger date is the same, marked in the governance actions of the same day.

-- Price

--

You may also like

MYX Case Analysis: The Complete Harvesting Tactics Behind the Fake Surge of Cryptocurrency Tokens

MYX Case Analysis: The Complete Harvesting Tactics Behind the Fake Surge of Cryptocurrency Tokens

Gate founder Dr. Han: The crypto winter drives structural reshaping, and everything on-chain will become a new paradigm in finance

Gate CEO Dr. Han appeared at the Hong Kong Web3 Carnival, emphasizing that "everything will be on-chain" will reshape the future of finance, and announced the acceleration of building an integrated trading hub that connects crypto and traditional assets.

Is XRP a Good Investment in 2026? Why Is It Stuck at $1.45

XRP is up 6.7% this week, but exchange reserves remain high. Is a volatility spike imminent? We analyze price trend, ETF inflows, whale activity, and regulatory catalysts to answer: will XRP go up, why is XRP dropping, and is XRP a good investment right now?

TL; DR

What is XRP: XRP is a digital asset built for fast, low-cost international payments. It runs on the XRP Ledger and is used by Ripple for its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service. Unlike Bitcoin, XRP settles transactions in 3-5 seconds with near-zero fees.Why is XRP Dropping: XRP is not actively dropping, but it is struggling to rise. On the monthly chart, XRP has seen six consecutive months of decline. Currently, the price faces an additional supply wall at $1.45. About 1.24 billion XRP were bought in that range, and those holders sell when the price approaches, creating selling pressure that prevents a recovery.Will XRP Go Up: Potentially yes. XRP is trading near $1.43 and showing its best weekly performance since September 2025. If the price breaks above the $1.45 resistance, analysts expect a move toward $1.90, supported by strong institutional demand.Is XRP a Good Investment: The answer is not simple. Short-term traders may see opportunity in the coming volatility spike. Long-term investors face a bigger question that depends on one key regulatory event. However, the data reveals a surprising signal that most retail buyers are missing right now. To understand whether XRP is a smart buy or a trap at $1.43, you will need to read the full analysis below.What is XRP? A Digital Asset for Global Settlement

Before analyzing the charts, it is crucial to understand the asset in question. What is XRP? Unlike Bitcoin, which was designed as a decentralized digital gold, XRP operates on the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It was created to facilitate fast, low-cost international payments. Traditional bank transfers take days and incur high fees. XRP transactions settle in 3-5 seconds, costing fractions of a penny.

Ripple, the company associated with XRP, uses this asset for its "On-Demand Liquidity" (ODL) service. Banks and financial institutions use ODL to source liquidity during cross-border transactions without pre-funding accounts. This utility is the primary driver for institutional interest. Recently, the network hit a milestone of over 8 million active wallets, signaling growing usage despite recent price stagnation . Furthermore, Ripple is proactively preparing for the future, releasing a four-stage roadmap to make the XRPL "quantum-resistant," aiming to secure the ledger against future quantum computing threats by 2028 .

XRP Price Analysis: The Battle for $1.45

The XRP price trend over the last month tells a story of exhaustion followed by cautious recovery. On the monthly chart, XRP experienced six consecutive months of decline. However, April shows signs of a bottoming process. Weekly charts reinforce this view: after four weeks of lower closes, the last two weeks have seen small rebounds.

According to data from April 22, 2026, XRP is trading at approximately $1.44. Over the last seven days, XRP has outperformed both Bitcoin and Ethereum, rising 6.7% while the broader market rose only 3.2%. Spot trading volume surged 23% to $3.79 billion, and derivative markets saw $40 billion in futures volume on a single day.

Despite this, the price remains 60% below its July 2025 high of $3.65. The current technical picture shows a "low volatility grind" higher. The 20-day EMA is at $1.3924, and the 50-day EMA is at $1.4119, both acting as support . However, the immediate hurdle is the $1.45 resistance level. This price point has rejected every rally attempt in 2026.

Why is XRP Dropping? And Will XRP Go Up?

The primary reason for the recent "drop" (or lack of upward momentum) is not active selling, but rather the "supply wall." Data indicates that roughly 1.24 billion XRP tokens were purchased by investors in the $1.45 to $1.47 range. These investors have been waiting months to "break even." Every time the price approaches $1.45, these holders sell to exit their positions, creating a massive wall that retail buying cannot easily absorb.

However, the underlying momentum is shifting. Analysts suggest a xrp volatility spike imminent because the absorption capacity of buyers is increasing. Historically, when exchange reserves are high but the price refuses to drop significantly, it signals that buyers are absorbing the supply. The price has held above $1.39 despite the overhang, which is a sign of relative strength.

So, will XRP go up? Yes, potentially. But it needs a catalyst, if the price closes a daily candle above $1.45. If that happens, the next targets are $1.60 to $1.65, and eventually $1.90 .

XRP Exchange Netflow and XRP ETF Netflow: A Tale of Two Markets

The current market dynamic is best understood by looking at two opposing data streams: XRP Exchange netflow and XRP ETF flows.

Exchange Dynamics (Retail / Whales):

Data shows a complex pattern of "large inflows and increasing reserves." Recently, a Ripple-associated wallet moved 75 million XRP (approx. $108 million) to Coinbase. This initially looks like a dump, but context matters. These transfers are likely to provide liquidity for Ripple’s ODL business, not necessarily spot market selling. However, the result is that exchange reserves have climbed to 2.76 billion XRP .

The Good News: While reserves are high, the rate of increase is slowing. Specifically, "whale" transfers to exchanges have dropped 98% from their April 11 peak. The Binance reserve has slightly decreased from 27.7 to 27.6 billion. The aggressive selling from large holders appears to have stopped.

Institutional Dynamics (ETF):

While whales were sending coins to exchanges, institutions were buying XRP ETF products. XRP ETF net flow is strongly positive.

US-listed XRP ETFs recorded four consecutive days of inflows totaling $38.86 million recently .The weekly inflow for mid-April hit $119.6 million, a multi-month high .Cumulative net inflows stand at $12.8 billion, with Assets Under Management (AUM) at roughly $10.8 billion.Analyzing the Divergence: Why Both Flows Are Positive

It seems contradictory that exchange reserves are high (suggesting selling) while ETFs are buying (suggesting buying). However, this phenomenon reveals the current market structure.

Different Investor Profiles: The exchange inflows likely come from short-term traders, market makers, or Ripple itself providing ODL liquidity. These are "hot" coins ready to be sold. The ETF inflows represent "sticky" capital. Institutions buying ETFs are typically long-term holders (LTHs) or asset managers who do not day-trade. They are removing liquidity from the spot market by buying through custodians.The "De-risking" Trade: Sophisticated funds might be engaging in basis trading. They buy the ETF (taking a long position) while simultaneously shorting XRP futures or selling spot inventory to capture the funding rate. This keeps the price stable while volume increases.Absorption: The most likely scenario is that the market is simply absorbing the excess supply. The fact that the price is stable ($1.43) and not collapsing to $1.20 despite 2.76 billion coins sitting on exchanges is a massive win for the bulls. The ETF inflows are acting as a sponge, soaking up the selling pressure from the ODL wallets.The Regulatory Catalyst: The SEC and the CLARITY Act

Fundamentally, the recent price action cannot be separated from regulation. For years, the primary answer was the SEC lawsuit. That narrative is dying.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse recently praised SEC Chair Paul Atkins as "a breath of fresh air and sanity" . This regulatory thaw is critical. The SEC is reportedly considering dropping the long-standing lawsuit, and five XRP ETF applications are awaiting review.

The major catalyst on the horizon is the CLARITY Act. A Senate markup is expected before the end of April. Standard Chartered analysts project that if the bill advances, it could unlock $4 to $8 billion in institutional flows . Polymarket gives the bill a 60-66% chance of passing in 2026. If the CLARITY Act classifies XRP as a non-security (commodity), the institutional floodgates will open, likely overwhelming the $1.45 supply wall instantly.

Is XRP a Good Investment in 2026?

Given all this data, is XRP a good investment? The answer depends entirely on your risk tolerance and time horizon.

The Bull Case (Why it is a good investment): The risk/reward ratio is asymmetrical to the upside. The price is near multi-year lows relative to its utility. Whale selling has stopped, ETF demand is rising, and the network is expanding (8 million wallets, quantum resistance roadmap). If the CLARITY Act passes, XRP could realistically trade between $1.60 and $1.80 in the short term, with a potential run to $3.00+ if the lawsuit is officially dropped.The Risk Case (Why it is NOT a good investment): There is a clear resistance wall at $1.45. If the CLARITY Act fails or is delayed past May (due to midterm election dynamics), the "buy the rumor, sell the news" dynamic could reverse. If the price fails to break $1.45 and loses support at $1.33, a drop back to $1.15 is technically possible .

Verdict: XRP is a speculative buy for traders looking for a volatility spike. It is a hold for current investors. For new investors, it is only a good investment if you believe in regulatory clarity within the next 30 days. Technically, waiting for a confirmed break above $1.55 (to avoid the fakeout) is safer than buying at $1.43.

FAQ

Q: Will XRP go up if the CLARITY Act passes?

A: Yes, historically. Analysts predict that if the CLARITY Act passes, signaling that XRP is a commodity, it would remove the regulatory overhang. This could trigger a surge in institutional buying, pushing the price from the current $1.43 range to test the $1.80 - $2.00 resistance levels quickly.

Q: Why is XRP dropping when Bitcoin is going up?

A: XRP has specific supply dynamics. Unlike Bitcoin, which has a fixed supply issuance, XRP faces periodic sell-pressure from Ripple's treasury wallets used to fund ODL (liquidity) services. Additionally, the $1.45 "break-even" wall causes XRP to drop relative to BTC when short-term traders exit.

Q: Is a volatility spike imminent for XRP?

A: Yes. The Bollinger Bands on the daily chart are squeezing. The price is stuck between support at $1.33 and resistance at $1.45. Historically, when XRP volume surges 23% in a week (as it did on April 21), it precedes a violent move. The direction depends on whether the $1.45 resistance breaks.

Q: What is the XRP ETF netflow status?

A: As of late April 2026, XRP ETFs are seeing positive netflows. The US ETFs recorded a single week inflow of $119.6 million in mid-April. Cumulative inflows are strong at $12.8 billion, indicating that institutions are accumulating during this dip, which is a long-term bullish signal for price stabilization.

Q: Is XRP a good investment for beginners?

A: XRP is less volatile than "meme coins" but more volatile than Bitcoin. For beginners, it is a moderate-risk investment. Its value is tied to real utility (bank payments). However, beginners should wait to see if the price can close a weekly candle above $1.55 before entering, to avoid buying into the current resistance wall.

Disclaimer: None of the information in this article constitutes, or is intended to constitute, investment advice. Trading cryptocurrencies carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Always do your own research.

About WEEX

Founded in 2018, WEEX has developed into a global crypto exchange with over 6.2 million users across more than 150 countries. The platform emphasizes security, liquidity, and usability, providing over 1,200 spot trading pairs and offering up to 400x leverage in crypto futures trading. In addition to the traditional spot and derivatives markets, WEEX is expanding rapidly in the AI era — delivering real-time AI news, empowering users with AI trading tools, and exploring innovative trade-to-earn models that make intelligent trading more accessible to everyone. Its 1,000 BTC Protection Fund further strengthens asset safety and transparency, while features such as copy trading and advanced trading tools allow users to follow professional traders and experience a more efficient, intelligent trading journey.

Follow WEEX on social media

X: @WEEX_Official 

Instagram: @WEEX Exchange 

Tiktok: @weex_global 

Youtube: @WEEX_Official 

Discord: WEEX Community 

Telegram: WeexGlobal Group

FC Barcelona vs Celta Vigo: Can Anyone Stop Barcelona at Home?

FC Barcelona vs Celta Vigo lineups, standings, and stats for April 22, 2026. FC Barcelona need a win to stay on track for the La Liga title. Full preview inside.

Carl Moon & WEEX Head to Mugello: The Crypto Trader's Ferrari Challenge

Forget the sidelines. WEEX is hitting the 300km/h mark at Mugello this weekend. Witness Carl Moon’s transformation from a supermarket cashier to a Ferrari racer, and discover why the world’s fastest trading floor belongs on the world’s most technical track at the official Ferrari Challenge.

How to Become a Pro Crypto Trader: WEEX Interview with Ferrari Racer Carl Moon

Ferrari racer Carl Moon on mastering crypto trading: 80/20 rule, AI tools, Bitcoin at $95K, and risk lessons from the track.

Contents

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more