Uniswap Token Burn Proposal Approved, What Is the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
Publication Date: December 26, 2025
Author: BlockBeats Editorial Team
Over the past 24 hours, the crypto market has witnessed various dynamics ranging from macroeconomic discussions to specific ecosystem developments.
Mainstream discussions have focused on protocol governance and value capture mechanisms, from token burns to fee structure adjustments. Mature protocols are recalibrating their relationships with token holders. In terms of ecosystem development, Ethereum has focused on the continued expansion of DeFi credit and asset management scale, while Perp DEX has accelerated the extension of trading pairs to include silver and other commodity assets, indicating that on-chain finance is transitioning from crypto-native to broader macro assets.
I. Mainstream Topics
1. UNI Burn Proposal Approved
The "Unification" proposal vote by Uniswap has concluded with an overwhelmingly positive outcome: 125,342,017 in favor and only 742 against. This proposal is seen as a key step for Uniswap towards a more unified governance structure. Key contents include burning 100 million UNI after approximately two days of voting, activating the protocol fee switch, Uniswap Labs shutting down front-end fees, and further focusing on protocol-level development.
Hayden Adams described the result as a "Christmas gift," emphasizing that this is a clear choice regarding protocol uniformity and long-term optimization direction. The original post author, Sisyphus, jokingly referred to this vote as "DeFi governance voting and third-world country election similarity," highlighting the high level of consensus.
Community reactions were mainly humorous and ironic. Many comments revolved around the number of dissenting votes, such as "742 dissenting votes are doing an incredible job" and "centralization will find a way." Some discussed the voting behavior in a more abstract manner, stating "perhaps this is human nature—we tend to choose familiar things," or likening the result to some kind of "oracle effect." While the overall atmosphere was light-hearted, beneath the jokes, there was a subtle hint of mild questioning of the governance process itself.
2. HYPE Burns Approximately 10% of Circulating Supply
The Hyperliquid community officially burned 11.068% (commonly referred to as "10%" in community discussions) of the $HYPE circulating supply through a governance vote. The corresponding address is 0xfefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefe and has been confirmed by the Hyper Foundation.
This vote used a proof-of-stake weighting mechanism, resulting in 85% in favor, 7% against, and 8% abstaining. The official statement positions this as a community-driven deflationary action aimed at reducing supply and enhancing token scarcity.
Community feedback overall highly positive. Most comments focus on the potential price boost of long-term value due to "permanently disappearing supply," such as "That's a big chunk of forever gone supply" and "Supply reduction, greater value potential." Some users also refer to it as "a paragon of deflationary action," bluntly stating "damn that's some serious deflation in action."
A small number of replies mention price expectations (e.g., referring to pushing $HYPE to $1,000 as larper), or express the view "Still need more." The overall sentiment is notably optimistic.
3. Wintermute Partner on Aave
Wintermute partner Evgeny Gaevoy shared views on the current state of Aave in a lengthy thread, first disclosing Wintermute's participation in Aave governance as an investor since 2022, but with no Labs equity. Key issues include mismatched value capture expectations (token holders vs. Labs), the infeasibility of a dual structure (token-equity) (quoting Hasu's view), and handling of external functions (e.g., BD).
He calls for a solution similar to Uniswap's "Unification," criticizes poor communication and politicized behavior, and announces Wintermute will vote against the current forum proposal due to its lack of detail, unable to ensure token value capture. He sees this as a "temperature check," urging all parties to calmly restart the dialogue to address long-term value issues.
Reactions focus on debate and questioning, such as "The token should either capture value or shouldn't exist," criticizing the interim state as "snake oil." Someone jokingly asks "wen thoughts on wintermute situation," prompting Gaevoy to respond calling it "purely imaginative." The overall discussion is rational but divisive, involving criticism of Labs communication and concerns about the proposal.
II. Mainstream Ecosystem Updates
1. Ethereum
Maple Finance completed its largest-ever single loan issuance yesterday ($5 billion), while the outstanding loan amount hit an all-time high (ATH). Some in the community see this milestone as a phase peak of the current DeFi credit growth cycle.
Founder Sid Powell, in an open letter, reviewed Maple's key milestones in 2025 and set 2026 goals: achieve $100 million ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue) positioning Maple as the "standard bearer for on-chain asset management," with core keywords being transparency, automation, and global accessibility.
The outstanding loan data of Maple's lending product Syrup continues to rise. The Dune dashboard shows that since June 2024, the outstanding loan size of Syrup has rapidly expanded, surpassing $1.5 billion by December, with Syrup USDT and Syrup USDC seeing a significant increase in share. The overall curve shows a steep growth from near-zero scale to 1.5B+, reflecting a significant recovery in the DeFi lending market.
Some institutional viewpoints (such as Relayer Capital) see $SYRUP as a high conviction position, believing that the continuously accumulating data is reinforcing the narrative of "opportunity scale + team execution."
Discussion highlights both Maple's breakthrough on a business level and the "protocol performance reaching all-time highs, but the token price still far below its historical peak" disconnect. Overall, 2025 is widely seen as a landmark year for Maple, with this progress further solidifying Ethereum's position as the core settlement layer of DeFi, while also being seen as potentially attracting more institutional-grade lending demand. However, the community also reminds that continuous attention to regulatory uncertainty and whether the incentive mechanism is fully aligned with long-term value is needed.
2.Perp DEX
Trade.xyz announces the launch of SILVER perpetual contracts, supporting up to 10x leverage and providing a 7×24×365 uninterrupted trading experience. The official emphasis on their product vision is "trade any asset anytime," allowing users to trade directly on the Hyperliquid frontend.
This launch is accompanied by visual content displays, emphasizing the convenience of on-chain trading of silver perpetual contracts. As a Perp DEX, Trade.xyz is further expanding its product range from native crypto assets to commodity derivatives, providing users with a speculative and hedging tool for silver price fluctuations. Within the Hyperliquid ecosystem, this move is seen as a significant complement to asset diversification and trading scenarios.
The overall community feedback is positive, with discussions focusing on leveraged trading opportunities and the potential bullish logic of commodity assets. Some caution that a high leverage structure amplifies both opportunities and risks. Overall, this event reflects the further maturation of the Perp DEX track and demonstrates that DeFi derivatives are continuously penetrating the traditional commodity market.
You may also like

From x402 to MPP: Cloudflare's crucial vote, will it go to Coinbase or Stripe?

BlackRock CEO issues annual open letter: The wave of tokenization has arrived, and we will lead this trend

When Backpack backstabs the community

When gold is no longer a safe haven, and Bitcoin continues to panic

Trump, the World's Largest Oil Trader

If the US and Iran have not reached an agreement in 5 days, what other cards does Trump have?

Tether Whale Dumps £12 Million, Backing Crypto’s ‘British Trump’

Ethereum Foundation Post: Rethinking the Division of Work Between L1 and L2 to Build the Ultimate Ethereum Ecosystem

Two Major Prediction Market Platforms Unite Rarely, What Is the Story Behind This New Fund?

Dragonfly Partners: Most agents will not engage in autonomous trading, how can crypto payments prevail?

US AI Startup Goes All In on Chinese Mega-Model | Rewire News Morning Brief

Trump Lies Again: A "Five-Day Pause" Psyop, How Wall Street, Bitcoin, and Polymarket Insiders Synced Uposciogen

When a Token Becomes Labor, People Become the Interface

Ceasefire News Leaked Ahead of Time? Large Polymarket Bets on Outcome Before Trump's Tweet

BlackRock CEO's Annual Shareholder Letter: How is Wall Street Using AI to Keep Profiting from National Pension Funds?

Sun Valley Releases 2025 Financial Report: Bitcoin Mining Revenue Reaches $670 Million, Accelerating Transformation to AI Infrastructure Platform
On March 16, 2026, in Dallas, Texas, USA, CanGu Company (New York Stock Exchange code: CANG, hereinafter referred to as "CanGu" or the "Company") today announced its unaudited financial performance for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025. As a btc-42">bitcoin mining enterprise relying on a globally operated layout and dedicated to building an integrated energy and AI computing power platform, CanGu is actively advancing its business transformation and infrastructure development.
• Financial Performance:
Total revenue for the full year 2025 was $688.1 million, with $179.5 million in the fourth quarter.
Bitcoin mining business revenue for the full year was $675.5 million, with $172.4 million in the fourth quarter.
Full-year adjusted EBITDA was $24.5 million, while the fourth quarter was -$156.3 million.
• Mining Operations and Costs:
A total of 6,594.6 bitcoins were mined throughout the year, averaging 18.07 bitcoins per day; of which 1,718.3 bitcoins were mined in the fourth quarter, averaging 18.68 bitcoins per day.
The average mining cost for the full year (excluding miner depreciation) was $79,707 per bitcoin, and for the fourth quarter, it was $84,552;
The all-in sustaining costs were $97,272 and $106,251 per bitcoin, respectively.
As of the end of December 2025, the company has cumulatively produced 7,528.4 bitcoins since entering the bitcoin mining business.
• Strategic Progress:
The company has completed the termination of the American Depositary Receipt (ADR) program and transitioned to a direct listing on the NYSE to enhance information transparency and align with its strategic direction, with a long-term goal of expanding its investor base.
CEO Paul Yu stated: "2025 marked the company's first full year as a bitcoin mining enterprise, characterized by rapid execution and structural reshaping. We completed a comprehensive adjustment of our asset system and established a globally distributed mining network. Additionally, the company introduced a new management team, further strengthening our capabilities and competitive advantage in the digital asset and energy infrastructure space. The completion of the NYSE direct listing and USD pricing also signifies our transformation into a global AI infrastructure company."
"As we enter 2026, the company will continue to optimize its balance sheet structure and enhance operational efficiency and cost resilience through adjustments to the miner portfolio. At the same time, we are advancing our strategic transformation into an AI infrastructure provider. Leveraging EcoHash, we will utilize our capabilities in scalable computing power and energy networks to provide cost-effective AI inference solutions. The relevant site transformations and product development are progressing simultaneously, and the company is well-positioned to sustain its execution in the new phase."
The company's Chief Financial Officer, Michael Zhang, stated: "By 2025, the company is expected to achieve significant revenue growth through its scaled mining operations. Despite recording a net loss of $452.8 million from ongoing operations, mainly due to one-time transformation costs and market-driven fair value adjustments, the company, from a financial perspective, will reduce its leverage, optimize its Bitcoin reserve strategy and liquidity management, introduce new capital to strengthen its financial position, and seize investment opportunities in high-potential areas such as AI infrastructure while navigating market volatility."
The total revenue for the fourth quarter was $1.795 billion. Of this, the Bitcoin mining business contributed $1.724 billion in revenue, generating 1,718.3 Bitcoins during the quarter. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $4.8 million.
The total operating costs and expenses for the fourth quarter amounted to $4.56 billion, primarily attributed to expenses related to the Bitcoin mining business, as well as impairment of mining machines and fair value losses on Bitcoin collateral receivables.
This includes:
· Cost of Revenue (excluding depreciation): $1.553 billion
· Cost of Revenue (depreciation): $38.1 million
· Operating Expenses: $9.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Mining Machine Impairment Loss: $81.4 million
· Fair Value Loss on Bitcoin Collateral Receivables: $171.4 million
The operating loss for the fourth quarter was $276.6 million, a significant increase from a loss of $0.7 million in the same period of 2024, primarily due to the downward trend in Bitcoin prices.
The net loss from ongoing operations was $285 million, compared to a net profit of $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The adjusted EBITDA was -$156.3 million, compared to $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The total revenue for the full year was $6.881 billion. Of this, the revenue from the Bitcoin mining business was $6.755 billion, with a total output of 6,594.6 Bitcoins for the year. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $9.8 million.
The total annual operating costs and expenses amount to $1.1 billion.
Specifically, they include:
· Revenue Cost (excluding depreciation): $543.3 million
· Revenue Cost (depreciation): $116.6 million
· Operating Expenses: $28.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Miner Impairment Loss: $338.3 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable Fair Value Change Loss: $96.5 million
The full-year operating loss is $437.1 million. The continuing operations net loss is $452.8 million, while in 2024, there was a net profit of $4.8 million.
The 2025 non-GAAP adjusted net profit is $24.5 million (compared to $5.7 million in 2024). This measure does not include share-based compensation expenses; refer to "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for details.
As of December 31, 2025, the company's key assets and liabilities are as follows:
· Cash and Cash Equivalents: $41.2 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable (Non-current, related party): $663.0 million
· Miner Net Value: $248.7 million
· Long-Term Debt (related party): $557.6 million
In February 2026, the company sold 4,451 bitcoins and repaid a portion of related-party long-term debt to reduce financial leverage and optimize the asset-liability structure.
As per the stock repurchase plan disclosed on March 13, 2025, as of December 31, 2025, the company had repurchased a total of 890,155 shares of Class A common stock for approximately $1.2 million.

The US AI Startup Is Loving China's Open Source Model

