Buy Crypto- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
US Spot Ether ETFs Surge Past One-Year Milestone with Record Inflows as of August 8, 2025
Spot Ether ETFs burst onto the US market a little over a year ago, and they’ve been on quite the ride, pulling in nearly $12.5 billion in net inflows while managing assets topping $22.4 billion today. Imagine these funds as the underdog heroes in a blockbuster movie, steadily gaining ground even as bigger stars steal the spotlight – that’s the story unfolding right now.
Ether ETFs Hit Their Stride with Unstoppable Inflow Momentum
US-based spot Ether exchange-traded funds just crossed their one-year trading mark amid an impressive four-week streak of inflows, featuring some of their most robust days yet. Picture this: it’s like a marathon runner finding a second wind, pushing harder as the finish line approaches. The US Securities and Exchange Commission gave the green light for these spot Ether (ETH) ETFs to start trading on July 23, 2024, bringing offerings from heavyweights like BlackRock, Fidelity, 21Shares, Bitwise, Franklin Templeton, VanEck, Invesco, and a pair from Grayscale into the fray.
Over the past 13 months leading up to August 8, 2025, these nine ETFs have collectively amassed total net inflows of around $12.48 billion, with assets under management swelling to $22.41 billion, based on the latest figures from CoinGlass. Remarkably, about half of those inflows – roughly $6.2 billion – poured in during an uninterrupted surge over the last 18 trading days. It’s no wonder enthusiasts are buzzing; these Ether ETFs have notched some of their biggest single-day hauls in the recent month alone, as per CoinGlass data.
While ETH has had its ups and downs, struggling to eclipse its all-time high of nearly $4,900 from November 2021 – especially as Bitcoin (BTC) has skyrocketed – it’s traded in a broad range from peaks around $4,200 in March to dips near $1,800 in June. Often playing second fiddle to Bitcoin ETFs, which debuted earlier in 2024 and have raked in over $68.3 billion in net inflows, Ether’s funds are carving out their own narrative. As of today, August 8, 2025, ETH is hovering above $3,850, dipping a tad intraday but still boasting a solid 12% gain over the past year, according to CoinGecko.
A Birthday Boost: Daily Inflows Rank Among the Best Ever
These US Ether ETFs celebrated their first full year of trading with a bang, logging their eighth-strongest inflow day on record, with $412.7 million flooding in on that milestone Wednesday. It’s like throwing a party where the gifts just keep coming – Nate Geraci, president of NovaDius Wealth Management, highlighted on X that seven of the top eight inflow days for these ETFs occurred in the last three weeks alone. Drawing from his insights, the absolute peak came on July 16, when $826.4 million surged in, underscoring the growing investor enthusiasm.
BlackRock Leads the Charge, Offsetting Grayscale’s Outflows
BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has been the star performer, capturing the bulk of net flows with $11.2 billion over the year. This powerhouse has effectively balanced out the hefty $5.1 billion in net outflows from Grayscale’s Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE). Originally launched as a trust back in 2017 and later converted to an ETF, ETHE has seen investors pull back as its trading discount to net asset value narrowed significantly. Think of it as a seesaw: BlackRock’s gains are steadying the whole setup.
Geraci noted on X that with nearly 1,200 ETFs launching since these Ether funds debuted, BlackRock’s version tops them all in inflows – a testament to its appeal. This kind of dominance isn’t just numbers; it’s evidence of how strategic positioning can turn the tide in a competitive market.
In this dynamic landscape, platforms like WEEX exchange stand out by aligning perfectly with the evolving needs of crypto investors. WEEX offers seamless trading for assets like ETH, with user-friendly tools that enhance security and liquidity, making it a trusted choice for those diving into ETF-related opportunities. Its commitment to innovation and reliability boosts investor confidence, positioning WEEX as a go-to hub for building portfolios that capitalize on these market trends.
Staking on the Horizon: The Next Big Leap for Ether ETFs
Now, issuers of Ether ETFs are eyeing the addition of staking features, where holders can earn rewards by locking up their ETH to help secure the Ethereum network. It’s akin to planting a seed and watching it grow – analysts forecast that the SEC might approve staking-enabled ETFs as soon as this quarter, potentially paving the way for more diverse crypto ETFs, including those tracking baskets of digital assets or even Solana (SOL).
A groundbreaking move happened earlier this month with the debut of the first staking ETF, a collaboration between REX Shares and Osprey Funds, which holds and stakes Solana to deliver rewards directly to investors. This innovation highlights the maturing ecosystem, much like how early internet pioneers laid the groundwork for today’s digital giants.
Recent buzz on Twitter, or X, has centered around ETH’s potential surge, with posts from influencers like @CryptoRover amplifying discussions on how staking could drive a 160% rally in ETH prices, based on on-chain metrics and market sentiment. Meanwhile, Solana’s sentiment is heating up as an opportunity play. On Google, top searches include “best Ether ETFs for 2025,” “how does ETH staking work in ETFs,” and “Ether vs Bitcoin ETF performance,” reflecting investor curiosity about yields and comparisons. Latest updates as of August 8, 2025, include a fresh SEC filing hinting at accelerated reviews for staking approvals, stirring optimism across forums.
Ether has truly stepped up post its “watershed moment” in the crypto space, as Bitwise analysts have pointed out, emerging as a resilient winner. High-conviction forecasts suggest ETH could climb 160%, while Solana presents intriguing sentiment-driven plays – all backed by real-time trading volumes and blockchain data showing increased network activity.
FAQ
What are the top-performing US Spot Ether ETFs right now?
As of August 8, 2025, BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust ETF leads with the highest inflows at $11.2 billion, followed closely by Fidelity’s offering, thanks to strong investor trust and consistent performance metrics from sources like CoinGlass.
How does staking in Ether ETFs benefit investors?
Staking allows you to earn rewards by securing the Ethereum network, potentially adding 4-6% annual yields based on current rates, making it a way to grow your holdings passively without selling – think of it as interest on your crypto savings.
Why are Ether ETFs seeing more inflows than ever?
The recent streak stems from broader market recovery, ETH’s price stability above $3,800, and anticipation of staking approvals, which could boost returns, as evidenced by over $6 billion in inflows in the last month alone per CoinGlass data.
You may also like
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?
Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x
Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames
Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun
Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold
Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar
Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?
Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire
Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition
From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash
The Xiaomi electric vehicle factory in Beijing's Daxing district has become the new Jerusalem for the American elite
Lean Harness, Fat Skill: The Real Source of 100x AI Productivity
Ultraman is not afraid of his mansion being attacked; he has a fortress.
US-Iran Negotiations Collapse, Bitcoin Faces Battle to Defend $70,000 Level
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
App