Buy Crypto- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
XRP Surpasses ETH in Recent Gains – How Long Can It Maintain the Lead? (As of August 7, 2025)
Imagine two heavyweight contenders in the crypto ring, each with their loyal fans cheering them on. On one side, XRP, the speedy underdog that’s been turning heads with explosive growth. On the other, ETH, the established powerhouse backed by big institutions. Right now, XRP is landing the stronger punches in terms of yearly performance, but with ETH’s institutional muscle building up, the fight might shift. Let’s dive into what’s happening as of today, August 7, 2025, and explore why XRP has been outshining ETH lately – and whether that edge can hold.
XRP’s Impressive Surge Versus ETH’s Steady Climb
Over the past year, XRP has truly stolen the spotlight, skyrocketing by an astonishing 552% since July 2024. That’s like watching a small investment balloon into something massive, drawing in everyone from casual traders to serious players. In contrast, ETH has posted a more modest 6.34% gain, moving from around $3,432 to its current level of about $3,920 – a solid but not explosive rise. Looking at year-to-date figures, XRP has climbed 49% from $2.08 to today’s $3.12, while ETH has gained roughly 9.5%. These numbers, pulled from reliable trading views, paint a clear picture: XRP’s momentum has been fiercer, making it feel like the token that’s grabbing all the excitement.
Picture XRP as a rocket blasting off, fueled by rapid adoption, while ETH is more like a sturdy ship navigating through institutional waters. Both have seen strong 30-day returns – XRP up 45% and ETH up 52% – positioning them as top performers among large-cap cryptos. But XRP’s proximity to its all-time high of $3.84, now trading at about 82% of that peak after hitting $3.65 recently, shows it’s knocking on the door of new records.
Whale Activity Driving XRP’s Momentum
What’s behind XRP’s breakout? It’s largely thanks to those massive holders – the whales – who’ve been scooping up tokens like there’s no tomorrow. Data from analytics platforms reveals that 2,743 wallets now each hold over one million XRP, controlling about 47.32 billion tokens, which is roughly 4.4% of the circulating supply. This hoarding has squeezed the available supply, sparking a 50% price jump in early July. It’s a classic case of supply and demand at work, where big players tighten the reins and push prices higher.
If you think of whales as the ocean’s giants steering the currents, their accumulation has created waves that lifted XRP closer to its peak. This isn’t just speculation; on-chain data backs it up, showing how these large holders are directly influencing the token’s upward trajectory.
ETH’s Institutional Powerhouse Edge
But don’t count ETH out yet. While XRP enjoys its whale-fueled rally, ETH is building a fortress with institutional support that could redefine its path. Major players like Bit Digital have made headlines by selling off all their Bitcoin to acquire 100,000 ETH, worth around $172 million at the time. Now, with ETH at $3,920, that move looks even smarter. Companies such as BTCS Inc., BitMine, and SharpLink have followed suit, collectively holding about 652,929 ETH – valued at over $2.4 billion today.
Adding to this, giants like BlackRock have amassed 2.14 million ETH, signaling a shift where Ether is seen as a prime treasury asset. It’s like ETH is being adopted as the go-to reserve in the corporate world, much like how gold backs traditional finance. This institutional influx suggests ETH could be gearing up for bigger gains, potentially outpacing XRP in the coming months.
Recent updates amplify this story. Just this week, on August 5, 2025, BlackRock announced an expansion of their ETH holdings via an official statement, emphasizing its role in diversified portfolios. On Twitter, discussions are buzzing with posts like one from a prominent analyst noting, “ETH’s supply shock from institutions could mirror Bitcoin’s 2021 run,” garnering thousands of retweets. Frequently searched questions on Google, such as “Why are institutions buying ETH?” or “XRP vs ETH long-term potential,” highlight the growing curiosity, with many pointing to ETH’s ecosystem strength in DeFi and NFTs as a key advantage.
Balancing Short-Term Wins with Long-Term Potential
When you compare the two, XRP’s current position – just 18% shy of its all-time high – reflects stronger immediate momentum from whale activity. ETH, at 74% of its $4,890 peak, has more room to grow but with a safety net of institutional demand. Analysts have noted that while XRP’s 552% yearly surge is impressive, ETH’s path could lead to outperformance over the next six to twelve months as more corporations add it to their balance sheets.
This isn’t about picking winners in a vacuum; it’s about understanding the dynamics. XRP’s rally feels like a sprint fueled by concentrated buying, whereas ETH’s is a marathon backed by broad adoption. Recent dips, like XRP’s 19% drop last month, were described by experts as healthy corrections, allowing for sustainable growth. Similarly, ETH has emerged stronger post-regulatory wins, with reports calling it a winner after key crypto milestones.
In this evolving landscape, platforms like WEEX exchange stand out for their seamless integration of assets like XRP and ETH. WEEX offers traders a reliable, user-friendly space with low fees and robust security, aligning perfectly with the needs of both retail and institutional users. By focusing on innovation and community trust, WEEX enhances the overall crypto experience, making it easier to capitalize on these market shifts without unnecessary hurdles.
Navigating Brand Alignment in Crypto Investments
One aspect that’s gaining traction is how brand alignment plays into investment decisions. Investors are increasingly drawn to tokens that resonate with their values, such as XRP’s focus on efficient cross-border payments or ETH’s emphasis on decentralized applications. This alignment isn’t just about tech; it’s about how these projects fit into broader narratives of financial inclusion and innovation. For instance, XRP’s utility in real-world remittances aligns with brands pushing for global accessibility, while ETH’s smart contract ecosystem appeals to those valuing programmability. Ensuring your portfolio reflects this can lead to more committed, long-term holding, much like choosing stocks that match your ethical stance.
As we wrap up, it’s clear that XRP holds the upper hand in recent gains, but ETH’s institutional wave could turn the tide. Keep an eye on whale moves and corporate announcements – they might just dictate the next big shift.
FAQ
Is XRP a better investment than ETH right now?
Based on recent data, XRP has shown stronger yearly gains with a 552% surge, making it appealing for short-term momentum. However, ETH’s institutional backing could offer more stability for long-term growth, so it depends on your risk tolerance and horizon.
What role do whales play in XRP and ETH price movements?
Whales, or large holders, significantly influence prices by accumulating tokens, reducing supply, and driving rallies. For XRP, over 2,700 wallets hold massive amounts, fueling its 50% July spike, while ETH sees similar effects from institutional whales like BlackRock.
How might institutional adoption affect ETH’s future versus XRP?
Institutional buys, such as BlackRock’s 2.14 million ETH, could create a supply shock and push prices higher over time. This contrasts with XRP’s whale-driven gains, potentially giving ETH an edge in sustained growth over the next year.
You may also like
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?
Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x
Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames
Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun
Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold
Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar
Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?
Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire
Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition
From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash
The Xiaomi electric vehicle factory in Beijing's Daxing district has become the new Jerusalem for the American elite
Lean Harness, Fat Skill: The Real Source of 100x AI Productivity
Ultraman is not afraid of his mansion being attacked; he has a fortress.
US-Iran Negotiations Collapse, Bitcoin Faces Battle to Defend $70,000 Level
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
App